
Policy portfolios: Empowering long-term thinking and tactical flexibility
This report summarises how policy portfolios support long-term, multigenerational investment planning by balancing strategic discipline with tactical flexibility. It presents model portfolios for institutional and ultra-high-net-worth clients, emphasising client-specific customisation, risk management, and the integration of long-term capital market assumptions to guide portfolio construction and decision-making.
Please login or join for free to read more.

OVERVIEW
How Do Policy Portfolios Serve Long-Term Investors
Policy portfolios establish long-term baseline allocations for institutional and ultra-high-net-worth investors, aligning investments with their objectives and constraints. They encourage discipline, continuity, and transparency while reducing short-term bias. Using 20-year capital market assumptions, investors can estimate expected returns, volatility, and drawdowns, forming realistic expectations. These portfolios support consistent decision-making, multigenerational planning, and management of illiquid assets that require long lead times for adjustment.
Client-Driven Versus Idea-Driven Policy Portfolios
Morgan Stanley Wealth Management advocates a client-driven approach over standardised, idea-driven models. Client-driven portfolios are customised to investor goals, liquidity needs, and constraints, allowing for tactical flexibility within a defined risk framework. In contrast, idea-driven models such as risk parity or “all weather” strategies are less adaptable and often depend heavily on manager skill. Customised portfolios support transparent, multi-layered evaluation of investment outcomes.
Developing Model Policy Portfolios By Client Types
The report outlines model portfolios for endowments and foundations, pension funds, and ultra-high-net-worth (UHNW) investors. Built using resampled optimisation to manage estimation error, they employ long-term capital market assumptions.
For endowments and foundations, models target returns between 6.0% and 7.5%, with private investments comprising 10–25%. They aim to maintain purchasing power and support 4.5% annual distributions.
For pension funds, model portfolios guide return-seeking allocations, targeting 7.5% long-term returns with up to 15% in private investments. The “Taft-Hartley” version restricts non-US equity exposure, while an alternative model removes this limit.
For UHNW investors, two versions are presented—excluding and including private investments. Conservative and market growth models excluding private holdings target returns of 5.5% and 7.0%, while those including them aim for 6.5% and 7.5%. Allocations to alternatives range from 20% to 37%, with volatility between 6.5% and 9.2%.
Building A Holistic Investment Process To Complement A Policy Portfolio
A successful long-term strategy combines policy portfolios with strategic and tactical tilts, active-passive optimisation, and manager selection. Given modest forward-looking returns, enhancing value through allocation, implementation, and management quality is essential.
Considering Tactical Allocation Tilts
Policy portfolios act as neutral baselines for tactical decisions. Morgan Stanley recommends setting tracking error targets—small (<1%), medium (1–2%), or large (>2%)—to control risk. Tactical tilts should focus on clear market dislocations rather than short-term volatility. For instance, adjustments to fixed income duration during the 2020–2024 period reflected shifts in yield and inflation expectations.
Seeking Value-Added In Portfolio Implementation: Active-Passive Optimisation And Manager Selection
The firm’s Active-Passive Framework combines long-term assessments with shorter-term, cycle-sensitive overlays to determine where active management adds value. Active strategies are favoured in less efficient, broader markets, while passive vehicles suit efficient asset classes. Manager selection is guided by Morgan Stanley’s Global Investment Manager Analysis team, supported by Adverse Active Alpha, Risk Score, and Value Score tools that evaluate performance, risk management, and value relative to cost.
Evaluating Performance Contributions From Three Levels Of Decision-Making
Portfolio performance can be attributed to three layers: policy allocation (strategic mix), tactical allocation (shorter-term tilts), and implementation (manager or vehicle choice). This framework isolates where value is created or lost, improving long-term accountability and insight.
Conclusion
Policy portfolios provide a structured foundation for long-term investing, linking objectives to actionable strategies while maintaining flexibility. By integrating disciplined asset allocation, active-passive balance, and informed manager selection, investors can enhance portfolio resilience, transparency, and risk-adjusted returns across generations.