
Conservation investment blueprint: Environmental impact bond for green infrastructure
This blueprint details the application of Environmental Impact Bonds (EIBs) to finance green infrastructure projects. It illustrates how EIBs can be used to attract private investment to public infrastructure projects that offer significant environmental benefits, such as enhanced stormwater management and increased urban resilience. The document provides a framework for structuring these bonds to ensure both financial returns and positive environmental outcomes.
Please login or join for free to read more.

OVERVIEW
Overview of the conservation need and opportunity
Environmental Impact Bonds (EIBs) provide an innovative funding mechanism for conservation projects by linking financial returns to environmental outcomes. Investors share both risk and reward, ensuring capital is deployed effectively. EIBs are applicable across various conservation scales, from local to landscape-level initiatives.
Performance-based EIBs are highly replicable, making them suitable for diverse conservation efforts such as watershed protection and coastal resilience. By aligning financial incentives with environmental success, EIBs encourage investment in sustainable infrastructure.
Describing how the blueprint contributes to conservation goals
EIBs support conservation by providing upfront capital, contingent on achieving predefined environmental metrics. These metrics determine whether investors receive a performance-based payment. For example, in wetland restoration, increased fish spawning could be a direct metric, while sediment placement serves as an indirect indicator.
Biodiversity protection is a priority, with tools like the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (IBAT) used to assess threats and monitor improvements. Conservation investments must demonstrate measurable benefits to ecosystems and communities, ensuring funding is directed to projects with tangible impact.
The business model
EIBs are debt instruments with returns tied to environmental performance. Investors receive principal repayment, interest, and potentially a performance payment. The latter may be fixed, triggered by meeting a specific threshold, or variable, reflecting different levels of success.
Key stakeholders include:
- Outcome funders: Governments or organisations addressing conservation challenges.
- Environmental service providers: Responsible for implementing conservation projects.
- Evaluators: Independent parties verifying performance.
- Intermediaries: Entities structuring the deal and coordinating stakeholders.
- Impact investors: Providing capital in exchange for ESG-aligned returns.
Revenue generation may stem from avoided costs, such as reduced regulatory fines, infrastructure savings, or lower environmental remediation expenses. Some transactions may include philanthropic guarantees to reduce investor risk.
The investment model
EIBs ensure capital deployment is based on environmental performance. A typical transaction is at least $2-3 million, given structuring and evaluation costs. Bond duration aligns with project timelines, and interest rates may be lower than standard debt due to ESG incentives.
Investor types vary by project stage:
- Banks and lenders: Interested in ESG-driven private placements.
- Impact investors: Accepting variable returns based on risk-sharing.
- Institutional investors: Engaged in larger municipal or government-backed EIBs.
- Philanthropic entities: Offering guarantees to mitigate risk.
Risk management is integral:
- Performance risk: Addressed through scientific assessments and well-defined success metrics.
- Regulatory risk: Managed by ensuring legal enforceability and policy alignment.
- Climate risks: Considered in planning, with mitigation strategies like weather insurance.
- Government default risk: Managed through bond structuring and credit ratings.
Performance-based payment tiers allow issuers to share risk with investors. If environmental targets are only partially met, repayment adjusts accordingly.
Exit strategy and scalability
EIBs operate within a defined investment period, repaying investors through principal, interest, and performance-based payments. Larger public issuances may be tradable on secondary markets.
EIBs are highly scalable. The DC Water EIB model is being adapted for municipalities with similar stormwater management needs. The Louisiana coastal restoration pilot demonstrates how an initial $40 million investment can be expanded regionally.
By allowing multiple outcome funders to participate, EIBs create a sustainable investment framework. This approach ensures environmental goals are met efficiently while aligning public and private sector interests.